Ten Thousand Plateaus
A Brief History of Western
Philosophy In Haiku Format
1/7
this
is not
a poem
one
two
three
the ten thousand things!
2/7
everything
either being or nonbeing
being!
is there something
or nothing
something!
what
is is
what is
heh
on
hen!
phenomen
on
maya!
3/7
qua
ontos on
arithmos!
write
on the
moon
4/7
qua
ontos on
eidos!
epekeina
tes ousia
hen!
5/7
qua
ontos on
ousia!
everything being
has substance
matter and form!
6/7
aiton
meson
aitation!
remaining
roaming
returning!
qua
ontos on
trias!
7/7
matter
distilled
atoma!
shapes
ordered
positions!
rhythmic
contact
modality!
8/7
nothing
is ever created out of
nothing
atoms
live
forever!
universe
without a center
9/7
space divided
by time
velocity!
10/7
either perception
or matter
perception!
esse
est
percipi
qua
ontos on
phenomenon!
11/7
between the destruction of the universe
and the scratching of my finger
indifference!
12/7
awakened
I cannot distinguish
reality from the dream
bodies, shapes
extensions, motions
all illusions!
no sky, no earth
no mind, no matter
what is left? what is left?
shut your eyes
stop your ears
tabula rasa!
esse
est
cogito
qua
ontos on
no!
consciousness
therefore
existence!
13/7
qua
ontos on
phenomenoumenon!
either phenomenon
or noumenon
phenomenon!
all phenomenon
in space and time
transcendental analysis!
taijitu
space-time
catvāri āryasatyāni
quantities, qualities,
relations and modes
transcendental synthesis!
1.
unity in
plurality
totality!
2.
negation of
reality
limitation!
3.
substances
in dependence
community!
4.
the possibility
of existence
necessity!
14/7
atoms
with souls
monads!
inside the outside
outside the inside
everything folds!
between
matter and mind
origami!
all things contain
and are contained
universes within universes within...
15/7
beyond
good and evil
ethics!
the difference between
mind and body
chimera!
God is nothing but
the absolute and eternal essence
of substance!
esse
est
essendai
qua
ousia on
attributes and modes!
16/7
thesis
antithesis
synthesis!
beyond subjectivity and
objectivity
the absolute!
sensation
thought
das ding!
master
slave
revolution!
immanent
transcendence
essence!
either being
or nonbeing
becoming!
either something
or nothing
dialectic!
17/7
subjectivity
is truth
subjectivity is reality!
transcendental
immanence
existence!
18/7
all consciousness
is consciousness
of something
acts
of thought
noesis!
intentional
objects of thought
noema!
to the
things
themselves!
19/7
the substance
of being
one, two, three!
qualities
relations
representations!
anything
meaning anything
signs!
firstness
secondness
thirdness!
20/7
all consciousness
is something
between perception
and action
affection!
both being
and nonbeing
becoming!
no space
no time
movement!
neither unity
nor multiplicity
duration!
absolute
indifference
intuition!
life as one
indivisible embrace
elan vital!
creative
evolution!
21/7
signifier
signified
signification!
all language
is
difference
linguists
pinning down
ghosts
22/7
all
things
related!
between two lights
time's'pace
unravels
neither space
nor time
spacetime!
mass at the
speed of light
energy!
23/7
this machine
kills
fascists!
24/7
philosophy's
idle wheels
language on holiday
whereof one
cannot speak
thereof one must be silent
thank the bees for their honey
as if they were kind enough
to have prepared it for you
magicians
by the roadside
conjuring words
how small a thought it takes
to fill a whole life!
lingual paths
everywhere
wrong turnings
metaphysical
landscapes
frictionless ice
lucid
nonsense!
don't worry
I know you'll
never understand
out of
the fly bottle
into the rough
tell them
I've had a wonderful life
25/7
let what shows itself
be seen from itself
just as it shows from itself
the essence
of dasein
care!
between existence
and existing
existenz!
thrown
into the world
falling!
no matter
how far I get
horizons!
thoughts
are
utensils!
dead
ends
new beginnings!
26/7
if your life is
burning well
poetry is just the ash
27/7
all consciousness
is perceptual
consciousness!
I am
my
body
here
where
eye am
the world is
wholly inside
and I am wholly outside myself
my two hands meet
which touches
and which is touched?
between perception
and expression
chiasm!
neither present
nor absent
visible and invisible!
subjective objectivity
objective subjectivity
intersubjective existence!
philosophy
yrteop in
reverse
language is everything
since it is the
voice of no-one
all things
speak
waves, forests...
folded
into the universe
flesh to flesh
28/7
knowledge
is
power
those called "mad"
sent to sea
so the "sane" may forget
schools, prisons, asylums
discipline and punish
subjects
of the state
subjected to the state
violence
breeds violence
breeds violence...
judgment
limits
compassion
unity
is an
illusion
rea
lity is disco
ntinuous
unknow
the
self
29/7
beyond images
and symbols
the real!
30/7
memories
of a
sorcerer
neither either
nor or
both and! both and!
multiplicity!
multiplicity!
multiplicity!
a stream
without
beginning or end
never cease
changing
leaves of grass!
all the while
I know nothing
I am nothing
drunkenness
is a triumphant irruption
of the plant in us
no matter how
homogeneous it seems
reality is heterogeneous!
statements
sentence by sentence
forest for the trees
tracing
leaves
in the wind
don't go for
the root
follow the canal!
movement line by bro
ken line
rhizomatic fungus!
mapping
spores
in the rain
rats are
rhizomes
burrows are too
the orchid forms
a map
with the wasp
layers
upon layers upon
layers upon...
there is
no ideology
and there never has been
never ask
what a thing means
what does it do?
control with
messages
create with assemblages!
folding
texts
read pages at random!
words
each a little
machine
since each
of us are several
there is quite a crowd
why keep
our own names
out of habit
the one
is the many
is the one
etre
est
et et et
and and and
and and and and
and and...
no signifier
never
interpret!
replace
history
with becoming
7000 years
of being man
become woman!
wasp becomes
the orchid
becomes the wasp...
become your molecules
become your atoms
become imperceptible!
roaming in packs
dogs
and children
every time
we are betrayed
a priest is behind it
first betrayal
desire is
lack
you can
fail twice
both in the same way
instead
of a sledgehammer
use a fine file
paranoia and
blockages
outburst of delirium!
talking to myself
aren't we all
schizophrenic?
Freud knew
nothing about
wolves
empty
yourself
full
you can't reach it
you are forever
attaining it
desert traveler
nomad on the
steppes
nothing
more useless
than an organ
disorganise
deorganise
reorganise!
enemy
of the organism
Body without Organs!
populated only by
intensities
Body without Organs!
refrigerator
waves
Body without Organs!
Spinoza's
ethics
Body without Organs!
cool
cooler, cold
Body without Organs!
philosophers aside
aren't you fed up
seeing
with your
eyes
breathing
with your
lungs
swallowing
with your
mouth
talking
with your
tongue
thinking
with your
brain?
why
not
walk
on your
head!
sing
with your
sinuses!
see
with your
skin!
breath
with your
belly!
31/7
we are but a way
for the cosmos
to know itself
we
are
starstuff
...
Individually (or in small groups) I probably would have enjoyed them much more. I think that the contradiction of brevity with the sheer volume of poems here meant to tell a somewhat sequential story might have been too hard for me to wrap my brain around.
On a more technical side, to me far too many fell into the pattern:
X or Y?
X!
Where X and Y are two ideas or concepts. It began to lose its punch for me before halfway through. I don't mind two diametrically opposed concepts to be paired, but I think that contrast is like Japanese flower arranging - there are times to contrast and times to blend.
That isn't to say that there weren't great moments for me, or that none of them achieved their purpose. The ending in particularly was great for me. I went to a philosophy conference once, and thought I was going to die it was a bit too intense with the arguments over the "true" meaning of a single word. I was so happy to see poet's poetry at the end instead of philosophy!
I honestly thought that 21/7 was somehow a reference to Jakob Grimm! (I'm a linguist, so that's what's on my brain. I know he's not a philosopher in the traditional sense.) Linguists pinning down ghosts just seemed to sum him up for me. It was kind of like learning the real lyrics to a song you've been singing in the car years later.
The pattern of either 'X or Y' and then reducing it to X is something that comes from philosophy itself and I agree totally with you - sometimes it is necessary to blend. But early philosophy mostly took a dialectic and then reduced it to one side. The initial question of Western philosophy was is there being or non-being, to which the answer was being. And with Kant there is either phenomena or noumena, and for him it is phenomena.
By the end of the work this mode begins to slip and new ways of combining things is discovered slowly, which is why it begins to change by the end. And also - as we move into the 20th century the more '
I loved what you said about learning the real lyrics to a song you've been singing for years - a lovely turn of phrase.
So yeah - thanks for the great comment. I am aware that some of the structure becomes repetitive, but I also think that it is somewhat necessary in order to lead you through the way philosophy developed... from an ontological perspective to a phenomenological perspective - from the either/or situation, to the both/and situation.
Still needs a lot of work though.
but those lines in latin (?) remains a mystery to me.
thank the bees for their honey
as if they were kind enough
to have prepared it for you
maybe they did.
don't worry
I know you'll
never understand
i guess you are right here.
it is a lot like mini-lecture notes... as if I were taking notes on the universes lecturing... I was never a fan of Gaardner's work, although I really respect what she was trying to do for children.
thanks for the comment.
best,
Dick from Solar
I love 14/7 and 18/7!
I don't think I've had a better response.
are you a fan of Leibniz and Husserl??
I absolutely adore Leibniz and consider him to be the smartest man who ever lived. The breadth of his thought...It cannot be described.
Kierkegaard I am currently slogging through, though it is incredibly rewarding. His existentialist conclusions are disarmingly similar to many I have had throughout my paltry philosophical musings. Naturally, his are infinitely more robust and clear.
He is a really interesting philosopher to me. I like the way he mines the depths of the "subjective" self. I also like his humour - it is rare to find philosophers engaging with being funny like Kierkegaard - that is why Deleuze is one of my favourites. He is incredibly austere, but also very funny.
I hope there is some joy there too - a joy in terror (not something we are too comfortable with these days).
nice to have met you.
sleep well.